Color Gamut of Retina Display MacBook Pro

When Apple announced the Retina display MacBook Pro, they made a number of claims about its improvements. Beyond the obvious improvement in resolution, these were a bit vague. I will be publishing an article on the reduced reflectivity of the screen later today. But first, I wanted to show the color gamut of the new Retina display, and compare it to that of my earlier 15″ Unibody MacBook Pro.

Retina Display Gamut in Red, sRGB in Green.

Earlier Unibody MacBook Pro Gamut in Blue, sRGB in Green.

As you can see from the gamut graphs above, Apple has done much the same thing in moving to the Retina display on the MacBook Pro that they did when moving to the Retina display on the iPad. The gamut is no longer small and skewed; it is very close to sRGB. This means that non-color managed sRGB content, such as materials on the web, will be much more accurately displayed, and that the display will be more capable of displaying photos than earlier MacBooks, since even when earlier versions were calibrated, they could still only display about 70% of sRGB, rather than the whole sRGB gamut.

This gamut normalization and enlargement will do wonders for using MacBooks for photography work, and will even make advanced image editing possible. Other factors that are improved on the new Retina display will also be important, including its much improved viewing angle, and its reduced reflectivity. The Retina display is, simply put, the biggest advance ever, in laptop screens for photography and video work; and would be even without the resolution increase.

While the gamut of the Retina display is a good match to sRGB already, calibration made improvements to the white point and gamma which were crucial to getting good matching to a high end desktop display. Visual match to my calibrated desktop displays is excellent with the Retina display MacBook Pro.

Credits: C. David Tobie, Copyright 2012. Website: CDTobie.com Return to Blog’s Main Page

Advertisements

14 responses to “Color Gamut of Retina Display MacBook Pro

  1. The shame of the new Retina equipped Mac Book Pros is the smallness of the SSD offerings, the inability of the user to add a second SSD internally and that RAM is soldered to the motherboard.

    Although both Retina version MBPs allow for 16GB RAM, only the 2.6Ghz Retina MBP allows for a 768GB SSD option and that bumps the price up to $3,499.00 . Adding more storage requires an external drive – preferably a Thunderbolt drive , either a portable like the 1TB Seagate or a larger office based RAID array or the forthcoming DROBO system.

    Starting with a 2.6 non Retina screened MBP ($2,199) I can have Apple add a 1TB 5400rpm HDD for $100, an anti-glare screen for another $100 and then going through OWC up the RAM from 8GB to 16GB ($169.00) and add an internal 240GB SSD drive for the OS and applications (also via OWC) for $300.00. The total for that configuration is $2,868.00.

    I really want a new Mac Book Pro and as a working photographer I want a Retina screen with it, but the thinner form factor of the current Retina equipped MBPs causes some structural compromises I am not yet willing to make. Those compromises and the price difference (which if amortized over three years is inconsequential) keeps me from pulling the trigger just yet.

    • Hi Ellis,

      This is what I call “The Grease Monkey Argument”… basically the lack of user/third party upgradability of components, and the cost of Apple’s components, plus the limits based on the new design and SSDrives. Yup; all true. But I don’t think that will keep this machine from being a rave hit, and its descendants over the next year or two from taking over the market, in terms of Apple laptops, photographers laptops, and videographers laptops. Remember the plaintive “But why doesn’t it have a floppy drive?” when the iMac came out? Well, the optical drive, and the internal hard drive are the next to go, as I predicted in a previous article. This amazing machine is just one more nail in that coffin.

  2. well nice to have a closer srgb screen but my problem with apple is the printing of images not looking at them on the web or ipad. what ever happened to the nice little company who created desktop publishing ?

    • Well, I’m building custom printer profiles with SpyderPrint, and getting great output from my Macs, though there are certainly more speed bumps in the process than there used to be. The iPad does change the number of items destined for print, and printing from iOS is certainly not up to fine art printing standards yet, but overall, the mix of iPad (and occasional iPhone) portfolio uses, plus MacBook Pro editing and printing, as well as Studio editing and printing with a MacPro, is working for me… for more typical users, I’m seeing the newer printers working reasonably well with canned profiles for general output. CMYK and Prepress are separate issues, I’m dealing mostly with photography.

  3. Pingback: Sizing up the Retina Display with professional photography, color calibration | photoshoptutorials.za.net

  4. Pingback: Mein Senf: MacBook Pro mit Retina-Display

  5. I calibrated my retina using Spyder4, got 99% sRGB. Also said gamma was 2.4.
    Any of the many gamma estimation web pages say I’m about 1.2! Is this a mis-rendering of the web pages or ?? Thanks for any clarification.

    • That all sounds about right. The trick such pages use to estimate gamma is to compare a medium gray to black and white bars, assuming that at the gamma that matches the eye (somewhere between 2.2 and 2.4) they two will match. But the retina screen has double that resolution, so their trick fails. It fails by a nice round factor of two, which is reassuring.

    • You would set the Spyder configuration, as with any Apple display, to White LED backlight, Standard Gamut. It should be able to tell with both, and nag you if you set either incorrectly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s